Pharmaceutical narratives surrounding the “flu” are based on fraud and are primarily designed to sell worthless vaccines
By ljdevon // 2024-11-04
Copy
 
When flu cases and flu deaths magically disappeared during the covid-19 scamdemic, it became clear that the narratives around sickness, disease, treatment, vaccines and immunity were being manipulated to control the population. Pharmaceutical narratives surrounding the flu have been grossly misleading for decades. A new research report by Rhoda Wilson at the Expose finds influenza to be a rare infectious disease. According to more than 50 years of data, published in the Cochrane Reviews, around 97.5% of symptoms traditionally attributed to the flu are not caused by influenza, and the fatality rate is virtually nonexistent. These findings are based on the work of Dr. Tom Jefferson, a prominent figure in the world of evidence-based medicine. His work has been gaining attention for his ongoing series of articles titled "The Dot Series," on the Substack page "Trust the Evidence.” The project originally aimed to share insights from Jefferson and his colleagues regarding influenza vaccines but has since evolved into a critical examination of four Cochrane reviews that highlight the poor performance of these vaccines.

The real influenza is rare, elusive, and doesn’t present complications

Jefferson’s research flies in the face of mortality data provided by official government sources. The World Health Organization (WHO) claims that seasonal influenza kills up to 650,000 people annually. So, why has the flu label been traditionally attributed to these deaths around the world, and what is actually driving the mortality? Is flu being intentionally exaggerated to coerce populations to take products (seasonal flu vaccines) that are marketed as the preventative cure? If these products were the cure, why hasn’t “influenza” and all the associated symptoms and cases of illness been eradicated? How many flu vaccines must a person take to feel safe from this disease? Dr. Jefferson's reflections trace back to the mid-1990s, when he began working with the Cochrane Collaboration to establish protocols for reviewing influenza vaccines. His commitment to rigorously analyzing randomized controlled trials led to the realization that much of the perceived threat of influenza was exaggerated. Jefferson notes, "In the healthy adult’s review, the placebo arm picked up 465 cases out of 18,593 participants. So, of the folks with symptoms, 97.5% were not caused by influenza." His findings challenge the prevailing narrative promoted by health authorities, which often present dire statistics regarding flu-related deaths and hospitalizations. Jefferson concludes, "Complications were very rare; for deaths, we found zilch — not the figures put forward by the CDC." He also accuses U.S. authorities of knowing about the fraud of influenza, saying they “bent over backwards to defend each other and cover up the scam.” According to his research, novel changes to influenza A and B are uncommon, making the virus rare and slow moving. For these reasons, he suggests, “Population interventions such as inactivated vaccines do not stand a chance against a relatively rare moving target like influenza.”

Flu is fraudulently marketed every year to sell worthless vaccines

His research, encapsulated in four randomized, placebo-controlled trials, gives a clearer picture of influenza incidence (indicated by antibody titers and/or viral positive culture isolates). The dataset includes observed and recorded cases at the height of the “winter influenza season.” From the dataset of 18,593 participants, the placebo arm showed 465 symptoms of influenza, even though they weren’t infected with influenza in any measurable way. It turns out that there are multiple infective and non-infective agents that cause the same signs and symptoms as influenza. This fraudulent correlation helps explain why these same signs and symptoms were not called influenza during the covid-19 hysteria, and were instead labeled something completely new – COVID-19. Medical authorities are pressured to label universal signs and symptoms of illness as “flu” or “COVID-19” – depending on which disease is being marketed at the time. This is because there is always a new vaccine that is being marketed to advance the perpetual fraud. However, these vaccines only strain human immune systems, without taking into consideration the reasons why they present symptoms of disease in the first place. Flu vaccines are notoriously generated with antigens that do not match the various infectious bacterial and viral threats that take advantage of human immune systems every year. Furthermore, no trials across 50 years of data were able to detect deaths from influenza, and hospitalizations were relatively rare. So-called flu hospitalizations could be a mixture of many different underlying chronic diseases, inflammatory responses to various unknown agents, and/or the detoxification processes of the cells.  These "flu" cases could very easily be the result of a weakened immune system that is overtaxed by sugars and endocrine disrupting chemicals. Various toxic vectors, including all the antibiotics and vaccines that a person takes, prompt an acidic environment to express disease. It’s time to take an objective look at the poisons – especially the vaccines – that are the underlying reason for people’s signs and symptoms of “influenza” and “covid.” Immunosuppression begins, not with a specific marketable virus, but instead with all the damage that is inflicted on the individual’s microbiome and cellular terrain. Malnutrition sets people up for disease. The drugs that destroy the microbiome are the precursor to these symptoms of “influenza.” The medical literature is begging us to question the flu vaccine campaigns and take a different approach to understanding the signs and symptoms that are so readily attributed to influenza. For more on the issue: Sources include: PBS.org SHTFPlan.com WHO.int NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov BMJ.com BMJ.com NaturalNews.com BMJ.com
Copy